Water harvesting represents a huge problem in many world places where its availability is limited. In particular, agricultural practices can consumes up to the 83% of the overall available fresh water. In this context, the choice of the opportune irrigation system and soil conditioner is pivotal for the sustainability of a production. Here we are facing a challenging issue: how to choose the best combination between two different and hardly related factors? One more time, Design of Experiments can help to solve our problem. In fact, when for exploratory reasons, two factors which include one hard to change (irrigation system) are considered, a special factorial design, named split plot design , can be employed. More detailed information about this topic are available in our last open access paper by clicking here .
A recent opinion essay by Prof. Tomas Hudlicky published in the journal Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. has generated a wide discussion about the controversial opinion of the Author about the gender and minority balance in scientific and academic environments. The focus of the discussion is related to a comparison between the need to attribute academic and scientific positions and opportunities through a pure meritocratic process, and the target to pursuit gender balance and in general an equity of possibilities between Scientists of different social groups. Looking at the heavy reaction of many Colleagues, including some chemistry associations, who condemned the paper content on social media, it is evident that Prof. Tomas Hudlicky didn’t find much endorsement, at least in the web. Honestly, I can see two major issues in the discussed opinion: 1) Science (and knowledge in general) has a very important social role, which can not be underestimated on the basis of the pure meritocracy. ...